Category: Research

28 May 2019

What is Bulk Density?

What is Bulk Density?

Ask people what a plant needs to grow and you will probably get answers such as, “sun, water and soil”.  The soil provides important nutrients (and fungal associations) to the plant, but also needs to have right physical properties to allow a root to grow and penetrate. The physical growth of the root is quite dependent of the soil in which it is trying to grow.

One important measurement in determining the ability for a root to penetrate the soil is bulk density.  Bulk density is the weight of dry soil per volume (grams/cm3).  This value reflects soil texture and compaction.  In addition to affecting the ability of a root to grow, bulk density will affect infiltration, water capacity, porosity, nutrient availability and soil microorganism activity.

Bulk density can be measured by collecting a known volume of soil and then measuring the dry weight of the soil.  At Greenacres, we use one of two methods, depending on our location.  In the pastures, easily accessible by the soil probe, we can collect a sample in a plastic sleeve.  The tube is then cut into known lengths to determine volume and the soil sample dried.  In the woods, we collect the sample by hand by driving a cylinder (known volume) into the ground and collecting the sample.

Table 1 compares some bulk densities across Greenacres properties. In general, bulk densities below 1.6 grams/cm3 are good for root growth.  The soil in Lewis Township is more compact and has a higher bulk density compared to the pastures at Indian Hill.  The management of these soils contributed to this difference.

Table 1.  Bulk densities were measured across 3 Greenacres sites: Beech Maple Woods, Front Nippert Pasture and Lewis Township field.

Location Bulk Density (grams/cm3)
Beech Maple Woods (transect 1) (0-10 cm) 1.05
Front Nippert (pasture) (0-10 cm) 1.1
Lewis Township (historically soybean field) (0-10 cm) 1.61

 

–Jennifer

10 May 2019

“The Best Laid Plans…..”

“The Best Laid Plans…..”

We were so excited to begin our controlled experiment looking at the horses pastured with and without chickens.  The pasture was chosen, the chicks were reared and a smaller mobile coop was constructed.  We did not anticipate that the chickens would be reluctant to leave the coop and forage in the field.  We suspect the chickens may be too young to begin foraging and this has disrupted out experiment.  The equine department will continue to monitor ticks to collect data on numbers and will also collect data on the chicken behavior.  This information will be used to strengthen future experiments.

–Jennifer

01 May 2019

Where the Wildflowers are…

Where the Wildflowers are…

Being in the woods daily has given me a perspective on spring ephemerals that I have not experienced before.  In the past, I would generally hike in the woods around April and “see what was blooming”.  This year, I watched leaves emerge from the ground and in some cases knew exactly what flower was coming, but in other cases I had to wait several weeks for a flower in order to identify the species.   The mottled waterleaf leaves emerged early but I saw no blooms until May. In some cases, I was waiting for a bloom that did not arrive (wild leeks- thank you Team Nature for that tip).  Mayapple poked up its stems over the course of one weekend and I missed the bloodroot flowers completely.  But now I have a better sense of what wildflowers are on the property and where they are blooming.

–Jennifer

Yellow trout lily blooming amid the invasive lesser celandine.
08 Apr 2019

Grass-Finished Beef Nutritional Study Publication

Grass-Finished Beef Nutritional Study Publication

Our research manuscript “A Nutritional Survey of Commercially Available Grass-Finished Beef” has been published in Meat and Muscle Biology™ , the official publication of the American Meat Science Association. 

Read the whole manuscript online or download a pdf copy.

From the abstract: Consumer interest in the source of their food, its environmental footprint, and the impact of diet on health has supported the growth of the grass-finished beef (GFB) industry. Studies have concluded that GFB has distinct nutritional differences from conventionally-finished beef. As the GFB industry continues to expand, it is vital to continue to explore the nutritional complexities and variation in the product. To achieve this, a survey of grass-finishing production systems throughout the USA was conducted, and beef finished on the participating farms was analyzed for its nutritional composition, including fatty acid (FA), mineral and fat-soluble vitamin contents. Samples were analyzed from 12 producers and annual production capacity of farms ranged from 25 to 5,000 cattle, with a mean age of cattle at harvest of 26.8 ± 2.30 mo. An array of finishing diets included grazing exclusively in perennial pasture, incorporating annual forage crops, and feeding a variety of harvested forages with supplementation of non-starch feed byproducts. Beef muscle tissue FA content was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The mean ratio of omega-6 (n-6) to omega-3 (n-3) FA in samples varied significantly by producer, ranging from 1.80 to 28.3 (P < 0.0001), with an overall sample set median of 4.10. A selection of minerals including iron, magnesium, and potassium were analyzed by ICP emission spectroscopy and mineral content significantly differed by producer for all minerals (P < 0.001). Mean α-tocopherol and β-carotene content was 610.6 µg/100 g beef and 32.2 µg/100 g, respectively. The amount of these antioxidants also varied between producers (P < 0.0001), but tended to be greater in beef finished solely on fresh forages. This survey indicates that commercially available GFB can vary in nutritional composition due to the diverse practices used to grass-finish cattle.